How Intelligent Design Advocates Turn the Sordid Lessons from Soviet and Nazi History Upside Down
PDF article by Wesley R. Elsberry and Mark Perakh.
Openintelligent design analysis archive
Static archive and reviewed paths for criticism of Intelligent Design claims, arguments, and public controversy.
article_index
Generated article browser for the first modernization candidate.
PDF article by Wesley R. Elsberry and Mark Perakh.
Openarticle
Matt Young takes up the criticisms that "intelligent design" advocates make about peppered moths and the studies showing that natural selection acted on their populations. The peppered moth example is still an excellent example of natural s
Openarticle
A detailed and testable scenario for the evolutionary origin of the bacterial flagellum.
Openarticle
A detailed and testable scenario for the evolutionary origin of the bacterial flagellum.
Openarticle
Andrea Bottaro responds to a criticism made by "intelligent design" advocate William A. Dembski about Bottaro's review of Unlocking the Mystery of Life .
Openarticle
Andrea Bottaro wrote a letter to TV station WNYE about their scheduling of the "intelligent design" propaganda film, Unlocking the Mystery of Life .
Openarticle
Science makes no assumption of naturalism beyond what intelligent design advocates already accept
Openarticle
The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth? Why Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial and the "Intelligent Design" movement are neither science�nor Christian by Brian Spitzer DRAFT
Openarticle
Mark Perakh evaluates William Dembski's presentation at the CSICOP conference in Burbank, CA on June 21st, 2002.
Openarticle
Matt Inlay responds to the immunity chapter, Chapter 6, of Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box .
Openarticle
[1] The claim that scientists by the thousands are joining the ID movement, and that it's just a matter of time before the rest see the light, is a propaganda technique known as inevitable victory , and is frequently employed by the ID move
Openarticle
Steve Reuland (aka "theyeti") takes a humorous but well-referenced look at the inconsistencies of the Intelligent Design movement and its advocates.
Openarticle
new term, irreducibly complex , (IC) has been introduced into public discussions of evolution. The term was defined by Michael Behe in 1996 in his book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution ( 1 ). Irreducible complexity
Openarticle
John Wilkins and Wesley R. Elsberry examine the claims made by "intelligent design" advocate William A. Dembski for his "explanatory filter". This is an online version of the 2001 Biology and Philosophy peer-reviewed paper, one of the few p
Opendrupal_article
Andrea Bottaro responds to a criticism made by "intelligent design" advocate William A. Dembski about Bottaro's review of Unlocking the Mystery of Life .
Opendrupal_article
Matt Inlay responds to the immunity chapter, Chapter 6, of Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box .
Opendrupal_article
new term, irreducibly complex , (IC) has been introduced into public discussions of evolution. The term was defined by Michael Behe in 1996 in his book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution ( 1 ). Irreducible complexity
Opendrupal_article
Original: Grist for the EF mill , by Matt Brauer, posted on March 25, 2004 06:36 AM.
Opendrupal_article
Nick Matzke reviews Jonathan Wells's book, Icons of Evolution . Icons of Evolution purports to document that "students and the public are being systematically misinformed about the evidence for evolution." But it is Icons itself that is rea
Opendrupal_article
Alan Gishlick, Nick Matzke, and Wesley R. Elsberry critique the paper published by "intelligent design" advocate Stephen C. Meyer in Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington in August, 2004. They conclude that Meyer's review pape
Opendrupal_article
Reed Cartwright provides an introduction to the series of chapter reviews of Jonathan Wells's book.
Opendrupal_article
Burt Humburg examines Chapter 1, and finds that Jonathan Wells has a severe case of Humtpy-Dumptyism. Wells just can't seem to bring himself to use words in a consistent manner.
Opendrupal_article
PZ Myers reviews Chapter 3, which takes up developmental biology. Consistently, Jonathan Wells has to serve up a mishmash of the biology in order to dismiss it.
Opendrupal_article
Jonathan Wells (2006) The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design . Regnery Publishing, Inc. Washington, DC. Amazon
Opendrupal_article
Ian Musgrave critiques Chapter 10 of PIGDID in this essay, titled "IC is not nice".
Opendrupal_article
Burt Humburg points out the irony of Jonathan Wells, Unification Church sanctioned theologian, setting himself up as a defender of traditional Christianity in this review of Chapter 15.
Opendrupal_article
Tim Sandefur takes on statements by Wells concerning legal issues surrounding the lawsuit over the Understanding Evolution website.
Opendrupal_article
Mark Perakh reviews Chapter 16, wherein Jonathan Wells engages in a massive fit of projection to try to smear evolutionary biologists with the heritage of Trofim D. Lysenko.
Opendrupal_article
Richard B. Hoppe takes Wells to task over Wells's misleading version of events in Ohio.
Opendrupal_article
A number of the contributors to the Panda's Thumb weblog review chapters from "intelligent design" advocate Jonathan Wells's 2006 book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design . The book proved to be a farrago of
Opendrupal_article
Brian Spitzer's review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial tells why it and the "Intelligent Design" movement are neither science—nor Christian.
Opendrupal_article
Mark Perakh's essay on the tactics used by William Dembski in responding to, or not responding to, criticism and critics.
Opendrupal_article
Wesley R. Elsberry and Mark Perakh examine the invidious comparisons made by "intelligent design" advocates where they liken evolutionary biologists to Soviet and Nazi leaders. In particular, the bizarre misuse by ID advocates of the exampl
Opendrupal_article
Ian F. Musgrave, Steve Reuland, and Reed A. Cartwright examine the claims of the Michael Behe and David Snoke paper published in Protein Science in 2004. While the goal of the Behe and Snoke paper is to generate impressive-looking improbabi
Opendrupal_article
William A. Dembski recently published a book, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design . The subtitle offers a promissory note, and so do several of the blurbs on the dust jacket and front matter to t
Opendrupal_article
Richard Wein's review of No Free Lunch argues that Dembski's case is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument dressed up in misleading pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo.
Opendrupal_article
Richard Wein replies to William Dembski's reply to Wein's Not a Free Lunch But a Box of Chocolates.
Opendrupal_article
Mark Perakh evaluates William Dembski's presentation at the CSICOP conference in Burbank, CA on June 21st, 2002.
Openarticle
A collection of commentaries on ID-texts, written by Morgan Grey.
Openarticle
A collection of commentaries on ID-texts, written by Morgan Grey.
Openarticle
A commentary of William Dembski's
Openarticle
A commentary on William Dembski's
Openarticle
A commentary of William Dembski's
Openarticle
From: Morgan Grey < cynical_prophet@yahoo.com > To: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Reply-to: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Date: Fri Oct 12, 2001 9:54 am Message: 21889 Subject: ID-Commentary: "Disbelieving Darwin..." This is my fo
Openarticle
From: Morgan Grey < cynical_prophet@yahoo.com > To: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Reply-to: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sun Oct 21, 2001 5:44 pm Message: 22008 Subject: ID-Commentary: "Who's Got the Magic?" Group, This is
Openarticle
From: "Wesley R. Elsberry" < wre@cx33978-a.dt1.sdca.home.com > Newsgroups: talk.origins Date: 1998/11/26 Message-ID: <199811261107.DAA21334@CX33978-A.DT1.SDCA.HOME.COM>#1/1 Subject: Dembski's Agency Triad [Quote] The actualization of one am
Openarticle
From: Wesley R. Elsberry < wre@cx33978-a.dt1.sdca.home.com > Newsgroups: talk.origins Date: 7 Jun 2001 19:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: <200106080021.RAA13020@CX33978-A.DT1.SDCA.HOME.COM> Subject: Re: No free lunch theorems In article <42YT6.1424
Openarticle
From: Morgan Grey < cynical_prophet@yahoo.com > To: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Reply-to: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sat Sep 8, 2001 12:10 pm Message: 21340 Subject : Re: Re[2]: [DebunkCreation] Any books on evolution?
Openarticle
From: Morgan Grey < cynical_prophet@yahoo.com > To: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Reply-to: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Date: Mon Sep 10, 2001 9:58 am Message: 21397 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [DebunkCreation] Any books on evolution? -
Openarticle
From: Morgan Grey < cynical_prophet@yahoo.com > To: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Reply-to: < DebunkCreation@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sat Oct 20, 2001 8:04 pm Message: 21990 Subject: Dembski `retracts' comments about Dennett As readers
Openarticle
042: Who's Got the Magic? by William Dembski Metaviews 042. 2000.04.25. Approximately 2286 words. In the posting below, William Dembski from the Michael Polanyi Center at Baylor University offers a critical review of Robert Pennock's book "
Openarticle
Meta 139: Dembski on "Explaining Specified Complexity" grassie@VOICENET.COM William Grassie Meta 139. 1999/09/13. Approximately 1883 words. Below is a column entitled "Explaining Specified Complexity" by William Dembski at Baylor University
Openarticle
From: Wesley R. Elsberry < welsberr@orca.tamu.edu > Newsgroups: talk.origins,comp.ai.genetic Date: 1997/02/28 Message-ID: <5F5BLK$LC1@NEWS.TAMU.EDU>#1/1 Subject: Dembski & the TSP William Dembski gave a talk last Saturday at the "Naturalism
Openarticle
Other On-line Articles These are some of the on-line articles I refer to in my ID-commentaries: Metaviews: Who's Got the Magic? (ARCHIVEID=2595) Disbelieving Darwin -- And Feeling No Shame! (ARCHIVEID=2581) Explaining Specified Complexity (
Openarticle
Short Description of page
Open