drupal_index

Drupal-Era TalkDesign Archive

Generated browser for clean static routes captured from the Drupal-era TalkDesign section.

Routes

drupal_article

Welcome to TalkDesign.org!

This web site, a sub-site of TalkOrigins.org, is a response to the "Intelligent Design" movement of creationism. It is dedicated to:

Open

drupal_article

Introduction to the TalkDesign.org Site

Talkdesign.org was created to provide a one-stop location for responses to the arguments of the Intelligent Design (ID) movement. Many articles critical of ID are scattered around the Web. Talkdesign.org provides links to the best and most

Open

drupal_article

Change at TalkDesign

TalkDesign is moving away from static, hand-written HTML pages to a spiffy content management system, Civicspace. The theme, for the moment, is the "interlaced" theme. We hope that with the change in system, more of the TalkDesign crew will

Open

drupal_article

Bottaro's Letter to WNYE

Andrea Bottaro wrote a letter to TV station WNYE about their scheduling of the "intelligent design" propaganda film, Unlocking the Mystery of Life .

Open

drupal_article

- DR. DEMBSKI'S COMPASS - or, How to lose one's way while looking for misdirection.

Andrea Bottaro responds to a criticism made by "intelligent design" advocate William A. Dembski about Bottaro's review of Unlocking the Mystery of Life .

Open

drupal_article

Evolving Immunity

Matt Inlay responds to the immunity chapter, Chapter 6, of Michael Behe's Darwin's Black Box .

Open

drupal_article

Background to "Evolution in (Brownian) space: a model for the origin of the bacterial flagellum"

Nick Matzke provides a brief article covering some of the background information needed to understand arguments made about bacterial flagella and Michael Behe's claims of 'irreducible complexity' for that organelle.

Open

drupal_article

Grist for the EF mill

Original: Grist for the EF mill , by Matt Brauer, posted on March 25, 2004 06:36 AM.

Open

drupal_article

Irreducible Complexity Demystified

new term, irreducibly complex , (IC) has been introduced into public discussions of evolution. The term was defined by Michael Behe in 1996 in his book Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution ( 1 ). Irreducible complexity

Open

drupal_article

Icon of Obfuscation: Jonathan Wells' book Icons of Evolution and why most of what it teaches about evolution is wrong

Nick Matzke reviews Jonathan Wells's book, Icons of Evolution . Icons of Evolution purports to document that "students and the public are being systematically misinformed about the evidence for evolution." But it is Icons itself that is rea

Open

drupal_article

Meyer's Hopeless Monster

Alan Gishlick, Nick Matzke, and Wesley R. Elsberry critique the paper published by "intelligent design" advocate Stephen C. Meyer in Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington in August, 2004. They conclude that Meyer's review pape

Open

drupal_article

Moonshine: Why the Peppered Moth Remains an Icon of Evolution

Matt Young takes up the criticisms that "intelligent design" advocates make about peppered moths and the studies showing that natural selection acted on their populations. The peppered moth example is still an excellent example of natural s

Open

drupal_article

Introduction

Reed Cartwright provides an introduction to the series of chapter reviews of Jonathan Wells's book.

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter One

Burt Humburg examines Chapter 1, and finds that Jonathan Wells has a severe case of Humtpy-Dumptyism. Wells just can't seem to bring himself to use words in a consistent manner.

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter Three

PZ Myers reviews Chapter 3, which takes up developmental biology. Consistently, Jonathan Wells has to serve up a mishmash of the biology in order to dismiss it.

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter Nine

Jonathan Wells (2006) The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design . Regnery Publishing, Inc. Washington, DC. Amazon

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter Ten

Ian Musgrave critiques Chapter 10 of PIGDID in this essay, titled "IC is not nice".

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter Fifteen

Burt Humburg points out the irony of Jonathan Wells, Unification Church sanctioned theologian, setting himself up as a defender of traditional Christianity in this review of Chapter 15.

Open

drupal_article

Critique Concerning Legal Issues

Tim Sandefur takes on statements by Wells concerning legal issues surrounding the lawsuit over the Understanding Evolution website.

Open

drupal_article

Review of Chapter Sixteen

Mark Perakh reviews Chapter 16, wherein Jonathan Wells engages in a massive fit of projection to try to smear evolutionary biologists with the heritage of Trofim D. Lysenko.

Open

drupal_article

Ohio

Richard B. Hoppe takes Wells to task over Wells's misleading version of events in Ohio.

Open

drupal_article

PT Reviews "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design"

A number of the contributors to the Panda's Thumb weblog review chapters from "intelligent design" advocate Jonathan Wells's 2006 book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design . The book proved to be a farrago of

Open

drupal_article

Quixotic References

[1] The claim that scientists by the thousands are joining the ID movement, and that it's just a matter of time before the rest see the light, is a propaganda technique known as inevitable victory , and is frequently employed by the ID move

Open

drupal_article

"The Quixotic Message", or "No Free Hunch"

Steve Reuland (aka "theyeti") takes a humorous but well-referenced look at the inconsistencies of the Intelligent Design movement and its advocates.

Open

drupal_article

The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth?

Brian Spitzer's review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial tells why it and the "Intelligent Design" movement are neither science—nor Christian.

Open

drupal_article

The Design Revolution? How William Dembski Is Dodging Questions About Intelligent Design

Mark Perakh's essay on the tactics used by William Dembski in responding to, or not responding to, criticism and critics.

Open

drupal_article

How Intelligent Design Advocates Turn the Sordid Lessons from Soviet and Nazi History Upside Down

Wesley R. Elsberry and Mark Perakh examine the invidious comparisons made by "intelligent design" advocates where they liken evolutionary biologists to Soviet and Nazi leaders. In particular, the bizarre misuse by ID advocates of the exampl

Open

drupal_article

TalkDesign Volunteers

Mark Perakh, PhD Dr.Sci, Professor of Physics Emeritus California State University Fullerton perakh@bigfoot.com www.nctimes.net/~mark, www.talkreason.org Wesley R. Elsberry, Ph.D. Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University http:/

Open

drupal_article

The advantages of theft over toil: the design inference and arguing from ignorance

John Wilkins and Wesley R. Elsberry examine the claims made by "intelligent design" advocate William A. Dembski for his "explanatory filter". This is an online version of the 2001 Biology and Philosophy peer-reviewed paper, one of the few p

Open

drupal_article

Theory Is As Theory Does

Ian F. Musgrave, Steve Reuland, and Reed A. Cartwright examine the claims of the Michael Behe and David Snoke paper published in Protein Science in 2004. While the goal of the Behe and Snoke paper is to generate impressive-looking improbabi

Open

drupal_article

Not a Free Lunch But a Box of Chocolates: A critique of William Dembski's book No Free Lunch

Richard Wein's review of No Free Lunch argues that Dembski's case is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument dressed up in misleading pseudoscientific mumbo jumbo.

Open

drupal_article

Response? What Response?

Richard Wein replies to William Dembski's reply to Wein's Not a Free Lunch But a Box of Chocolates.

Open

drupal_article

A Presentation Without Arguments

Mark Perakh evaluates William Dembski's presentation at the CSICOP conference in Burbank, CA on June 21st, 2002.

Open

drupal_article

You Missed a Spot, Dr. Dembski

William A. Dembski recently published a book, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design . The subtitle offers a promissory note, and so do several of the blurbs on the dust jacket and front matter to t

Open